Drivers License For The Internet
May 13, 3014
An idea the government has been kicking around since 2011 is finally making its debut. Calling this move ill-timed would be the most gracious way of putting it.
A few years back, the White
House had a brilliant idea: Why not create a single, secure online ID that
Americans could use to verify their identity across multiple websites, starting
with local government services. The New York Times described it at the time as a
"driver's license for the internet."
Sound convenient? It is. Sound scary? It is.
Next month, a pilot program
of the "National Strategy for Trusted Identities in Cyberspace" will begin in
government agencies in two
The NSTIC program has been in (slow) motion for nearly three years, but now, at a time when the public's trust in government is at an all time low, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST -- itself still reeling a bit from NSA-related blowback) is testing the program in Michigan and Pennsylvania. The first tests appear to be exclusively aimed at accessing public programs, like government assistance. The government believes this ID system will help reduce fraud and overhead, by eliminating duplicated ID efforts across multiple agencies.
But the program isn't strictly limited to government use. The ultimate goal is a replacement of many logins and passwords people maintain to access content and participate in comment threads and forums. This "solution," while somewhat practical, also raises considerable privacy concerns.[T]he Electronic Frontier Foundation immediately pointed out the red flags, arguing that the right to anonymous speech in the digital realm is protected under the First Amendment. It called the program "radical," "concerning," and pointed out that the plan "makes scant mention of the unprecedented threat such a scheme would pose to privacy and free speech online."
And the keepers of the identity credentials wouldn't be the government itself, but a third party organization. When the program was introduced in 2011, banks, technology companies or cellphone service providers were suggested for the role, so theoretically Google or Verizon could have access to a comprehensive profile of who you are that's shared with every site you visit, as mandated by the government.
Beyond the privacy issues (and the hints of government being unduly interested in your online activities), there are the security issues. This collected information would be housed centrally, possibly by corporate third parties. When hackers can find a wealth of information at one location, it presents a very enticing target. The government's track record on protecting confidential information is hardly encouraging.
The problem is, ultimately,
that this is the government rolling this out. Unlike corporations, citizens
won't be allowed the luxury of opting out. This "internet driver's license" may
be the only option the public has to do things like renew actual driver's
licenses or file taxes or complete paperwork that keeps them on the right side
of federal law. Whether or not you believe the government's assurances that it
will keep your data safe from hackers, keep it out of the hands of law
enforcement (without a warrant), or simply not look at it just because it's
there, matters very little. If the government decides the positives outweigh the
negatives, you'll have no choice but to participate.